ANNEX IV
Assessment criteria for commodities finance exposures
|
Category 1 |
Category 2 |
Category 3 |
Category 4 |
||
Factor: financial strength |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Strong |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Weak |
||
Factor: political and legal environment |
|
|
|
|
||
|
No country risk |
Limited exposure to country risk (in particular, offshore location of reserves in an emerging country) |
Exposure to country risk (in particular, offshore location of reserves in an emerging country) |
Strong exposure to country risk (in particular, inland reserves in an emerging country) |
||
|
Very strong mitigation: Strong offshore mechanisms Strategic commodity 1st class buyer |
Strong mitigation: Offshore mechanisms Strategic commodity Strong buyer |
Acceptable mitigation: Offshore mechanisms Less strategic commodity Acceptable buyer |
Only partial mitigation: No offshore mechanisms Non-strategic commodity Weak buyer |
||
Factor: asset characteristics |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Commodity is quoted and can be hedged through futures or OTC instruments. Commodity is not susceptible to damage. |
Commodity is quoted and can be hedged through OTC instruments. Commodity is not susceptible to damage. |
Commodity is not quoted but is liquid. There is uncertainty about the possibility of hedging. Commodity is not susceptible to damage. |
Commodity is not quoted. Liquidity is limited given the size and depth of the market. No appropriate hedging instruments. Commodity is susceptible to damage. |
||
Factor: strength of sponsor (including public private partnership) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Very strong, relative to trading philosophy and risks |
Strong |
Adequate |
Weak |
||
|
Extensive experience with the type of transaction in question. Strong record of operating success and cost efficiency. |
Sufficient experience with the type of transaction in question. Above average record of operating success and cost efficiency. |
Limited experience with the type of transaction in question. Average record of operating success and cost efficiency. |
Limited or uncertain track record in general. Volatile costs and profits. |
||
|
Strong standards for counterparty selection, hedging, and monitoring |
Adequate standards for counterparty selection, hedging, and monitoring |
Past deals have experienced no or minor problems |
Trader has experienced significant losses on past deals |
||
|
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Financial disclosure contains some uncertainties or is insufficient |
||
Factor: security package |
|
|
|
|
||
|
First perfected security interest (1)provides the lender legal control of the assets at any time if needed. |
First perfected security interest provides the lender legal control of the assets at any time if needed. |
At some point in the process, there is a rupture in the control of the assets by the lender. The rupture is mitigated by knowledge of the trade process or a third party undertaking as the case may be. |
Contract leaves room for some risk of losing control over the assets. Recovery could be jeopardised. |
||
|
Strong insurance coverage including collateral damages with top quality insurance companies |
Satisfactory insurance coverage (not including collateral damages) with good quality insurance companies |
Fair insurance coverage (not including collateral damages) with acceptable quality insurance companies |
Weak insurance coverage (not including collateral damages) or with weak quality insurance companies |
(1) First perfected security interest refers to a security interest in an asset (mortgaged as a collateral) protected from claims by other parties. A lien is perfected by registering it with appropriate statutory authority so that it is made legally enforceable and any subsequent claim on that asset is given a junior status.